Skip to Main Navigation
Skip to Page Content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.


The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Share This:

Abstract for IMM97009

Immunotoxicity of Clarithromycin in Female BALB/c Mice

CASRN: 81103-11-9
Chemical Formula: C38H69NO13
Molecular Weight: 747.9571
Report Date: September 1997


The following abstract presents results of a study conducted by a contract laboratory for the National Toxicology Program. The findings have not been peer reviewed and were not evaluated in accordance with the levels of evidence criteria established by NTP in March 2009. The findings and conclusions for this study should not be construed to represent the views of the NTP or the U.S. Government.

Clarithromycin (CLA) has been nominated for testing in the immunotoxicology program in part due to its indications for use in the treatment of secondary infections associated with AIDS. CLA is a new macrolide antibiotic with improved acid stability and pharmacokinetic properties which induces less gastrointestinal irritation and has a wider spectrum of antimicrobial activity than erythromycin. Clinical trails have shown CLA to be promising in the treatment of disseminated Mycobacterium avium-intracellular complex in patients with AIDS.

The objective of this study was to determine the sensitizing potential of CLA when applied dermally to female BALB/c mice. Measurement of the contact hypersensitivity response was accomplished by the mouse ear swelling test (MEST) and the local lymph node assay (LLNA). Concentrations to be used in the contact hypersensitivity assays were determined by the irritancy study. The doses of CLA tested were 0.2, 1.0 and 2.0% in acetone for sensitization, and 4.0% for challenge in the MEST and 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0% for sensitization in the LLNA. DNFB (2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene, Sigma Chemical Co.) was used as the positive control for sensitization in the MEST and LLNA at a concentration of 0.20% and at the same concentration for the challenge in the MEST.

The MIC of CLA was determined to be 4.0%. Clarithromycin did not show sensitizing potential in either the MEST or the LLNA in these studies. The positive control, DNFB, showed statistically significant in both the MEST (p < 0.05) and the LLNA (p < 0.01).

The studies were conducted at the Medical College of Virginia Immunotoxicology Laboratory. The in-life phase of the studies was conducted between 23 June 1997 and 7 August 1997. The animals were housed in the animal facility of the Strauss Research Laboratory. To the best of our knowledge, no significant deviations from Good Laboratory Practices occurred that affected the quality of the data or the ability to interpret the data with respect to the sensitizing potential of the Clarithromycin.


Summary of Irritancy and Contact Hypersensitivity Results
Type of Response Method Used Dose Response
(p < 0.05)
Positive Response
(p < 0.05)
Irritation Ear Swelling Yes 4.0%
MEST 24 hrs No No
  MEST 48 hrs No No
  LLNA No No

Abbreviations: LLNA = Local Lymph Node Assay; MEST = Mouse Ear Swelling Test