U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.


The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

National Toxicology Program

National Toxicology Program

UPDATE NewsletterUPDATE NewsletterJanuary 2015

NTP advisors like what they hear at meeting

By Robin Mackar
Reprinted from Environmental Factor, January 2015

Updates from National Toxicology Program (NTP) staff, which ranged from tests on chemicals spilled in West Virginia to systematic review and endocrine disruptor screening, were well received by the NTP Board of Scientific Counselors at their meeting Dec. 9-10 in Rodbell Auditorium.

West Virginia chemical spill research

Just five months after receiving a nomination from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, and meeting with West Virginia state and local officials about conducting additional studies on the chemicals spilled into the Elk River in West Virginia in 2014, NTP had a research plan in place and some early findings to share.

Scott Auerbach, Ph.D., of the NTP Biomolecular Screening Branch, presented a project overview, a timeline of activities, and introduced the board to eight different types of studies outlined in the plan. Auerbach provided a status update on each phase, from the least resource intensive — computational modeling, or structure-activity relationship analysis — to high-throughput testing, and then to the more complex rat prenatal toxicology studies. He also presented some early test results.

According to Auerbach, the 200 computational modeling scenarios completed by NTP helped determine the additional toxicology studies that are now being conducted. He also said that four of the spilled chemicals evaluated all tested negative using cell-based assays, which means they did not harm the cells they were tested against.

The research plan and study updates are available on the NTP site, which will be updated as studies are completed. Board member Robert Chapin, Ph.D., of Pfizer, New York City, complimented NTP on its nimbleness and its plan to communicate findings rapidly and openly.

Assessing the biological relevance of in vitro data

Warren Casey, Ph.D., who leads the NTP Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods gave a presentation describing how high-throughput screening methods provide results that are 97 percent similar to the animal-based screening method, which shows promise for the use of in vitro data to prioritize the testing of large numbers of chemicals.

Using a case study that NTP developed with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Casey presented results from the testing of 86 chemicals in 16 integrated high-throughput screening methods that measure the ability of chemicals to interact with the human estrogen receptor. Results were compared to results from the animal-based test (rodent uterotrophic bioassay) required by EPA as part of their Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program for assessing estrogen receptor activity. The two assays provided the same results for most of the tested chemicals. “This is an amazing predictive tool for determining whether or not a chemical has the potential to interact with the human estrogen receptor,” Casey said.

Systematic review, Report on Carcinogens, effectiveness of NTP, and more

Other topics discussed with the board included an update on activities related to the Report on Carcinogens, including the August peer review of trichloroethylene; learning about the status of NTP nominations to be studied, including two flame retardants; and hearing results from a pilot project that assessed the reach and effectiveness of NTP studies. Using hexavalent chromium as an example, the NTP Office of Liaison, Policy, and Review used a logic model to document the impact that NTP research has had on many areas, including public health.

The board also gave unanimous support for the Office of Health Assessment and Translation to move ahead with completing a systematic review of the literature looking at the effects on the immune system of two persistent chemicals, perfluorooctanic acid and perfluorooctane sulfonate. The Office started the evaluation as part of a case study to pilot test the seven-step systematic review and evidence integration approach developed by NTP to reach hazard identification conclusions.

(Robin Mackar is the news director in the NIEHS Office of Communications and Public Liaison, and a frequent contributor to the Environmental Factor.)

Back to Top

The Update Newsletter is produced by NTP Office of Policy, Review, and Outreach. The text is not copyrighted and can be reprinted without permission. If you use parts of the Update Newsletter in your publication, we ask that you provide us with a copy for our records. We welcome your comments and suggestions.

Director of Office of Policy, Review, and Outreach and Editor-in-Chief: Mary Wolfe | Managing Editor: Anna Lee Mosley