Chemical Lists for Test Method Development and Evaluation
NICEATM and EPA scientists have developed a process to identify reference chemicals that consistently produced positive or negative results when assayed in defined assays (Judson et al. 2019). To use HTS data in regulatory applications, the assays and the models built from the assays must be validated based on their performance against the biological targets they query. This requires establishing sets of reference chemicals and a process for assessing and reporting the performance evaluation of an assay that provides consumers of the data the ability to interpret the appropriate context for use of the assay. Both of these activities also need to be streamlined and rapid enough to manage the variety of assays that can help inform regulatory toxicity endpoints. Current efforts in this area are focused on using the data collected for identification of reference chemicals and establishing protocols to evaluate the performance of specific Tox21 and ToxCast assays.
This page provides lists of chemicals that may be useful for development or evaluation of new test methods. Some lists were developed during studies on new test methods and approaches conducted by NICEATM or compiled by NICEATM for inclusion in the Integrated Chemical Environment (ICE). Others have been recommended by ICCVAM or others for validation of alternative test methods.
Lists are downloadable as both Excel spreadsheets and tab-delimited text files. Lists may also be downloaded from ICE. Descriptions in ICE include characterizations of chemical lists as "reference" or "non-reference":
- Reference Chemical Lists (indicated in ICE listings with an "R") include chemicals that cause a specified well-characterized biological effect and therefore can be used to assess the performance of an assay designed to measure that effect.
- Non-reference Chemical Lists have inclusion criteria that are less restrictive than those of reference chemical lists. These lists may include chemicals with uncharacterized or ambiguous biological effects.
Where applicable, the sections below include links to the ICCVAM Test Method Evaluation Reports or references in the scientific literature in which the lists were originally published. Links are also available to pages on the NICEATM website that have additional information about the context under which some lists were developed. Users of these lists are encouraged to consult these resources to help them decide whether any of these lists might be useful for a specific test method development activity.
Acute Systemic Toxicity
Recommended Reference Substances for Evaluation of In Vitro Basal Cytotoxicity Methods for Predicting the Starting Dose for Rodent Acute Oral Toxicity Tests
- List of recommended reference chemicals (Excel file)
- List of recommended reference chemicals (Tab-delimited text file)
Published as Table 3-1 in:
Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM), NTP Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM). ICCVAM test method evaluation report: in vitro cytotoxicity test methods for estimating starting doses for acute oral systemic toxicity tests. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; 2006 Nov. NIH Publication No.: 07-4519.
More information about the NICEATM validation study of in vitro cytotoxicity test methods
Chemicals Evaluated for Carcinogenic Activity
EPA IRIS Carcinogenicity Classifications
- EPA IRIS carcinogenicity classifications (Excel file; includes metadata describing fields)
- EPA IRIS carcinogenicity classifications (Tab-delimited text file)
This list contains chemicals classified for weight of evidence of carcinogenicity according to the EPA Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment (2005). Detailed information on these chemicals is available in the EPA IRIS database.
Genotoxicity Classifications
- Genotoxicity classifications (Excel file; includes metadata describing fields)
- Genotoxicity classifications (Tab-delimited text file)
This list includes chemicals reviewed for Ames test results and genotoxicity classifications by Kirkland et al. 2016. Chemicals are classified as either Ames positive or Ames negative. Chemicals are also classified as “Genotoxic” or “Not genotoxic” based on a combination of Ames test results, in vivo genotoxicity results, in vitro mammalian cell tests, and carcinogenicity findings.
IARC Classifications
- IARC classifications (Excel file; includes metadata describing fields)
- IARC classifications (Tab-delimited text file)
This list contains chemicals classified in IARC Monographs 1-125 evaluating carcinogenicity to humans. Agents are classified according to four criteria:
- Group 1: Carcinogenic to humans
- Group 2A: Probably carcinogenic to humans
- Group 2B: Possibly carcinogenic to humans
- Group 3: Not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans
NTP Cancer Bioassay Chemicals
- NTP cancer bioassay chemicals (Excel file; includes metadata describing fields)
- NTP cancer bioassay chemicals (Tab-delimited text file)
This list contains environmental and occupational chemicals with data collected from NTP two-year bioassays to assess toxic and/or carcinogenic effects in rodents. NTP describes the strength of the evidence for conclusions regarding each chemical using five categories of carcinogenic activity: Clear Evidence of Carcinogenic Activity (CE), Some Evidence of Carcinogenic Activity (SE), Equivocal Evidence of Carcinogenic Activity (EE), No Evidence of Carcinogenic Activity (NE), and Inadequate Study of Carcinogenic Activity (IS).
RoC Classifications
- RoC classifications (Excel file; includes metadata describing fields)
- RoC classifications (Tab-delimited text file)
This list contains chemicals classified for carcinogenic potential according to the 14thReport on Carcinogens. Chemicals are listed as either "Known" carcinogens or "RAHC" (Reasonably Anticipated to Be Human Carcinogens).
Ecotoxicity
Acute Fish Toxicity Data
- Acute fish toxicity data set (Excel file)
Data were obtained from data evaluation records developed by the Environmental Fate and Effects Division of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) during their review of submitted studies. Focusing on studies submitted between 1998 and 2017, 181 conventional pesticides were registered by EPA, of which 110 had testing data generated in at least one cold freshwater, one warm freshwater, and one saltwater fish species.
Published as Figure 1 in: Ceger et al., 2023. Evaluation of the fish acute toxicity test for pesticide registration. Reg Pharm Tox 2023; vol 139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105340.
Endocrine-active Substances
Androgen Receptor Agonist and Antagonist Chemicals
- In vitro androgen receptor agonist and antagonist reference chemicals (Excel file) (R)
- In vitro androgen receptor agonist and antagonist reference chemicals (Tab-delimited text file) (R)
Published as Table 2 in:
Kleinstreuer NC, et al. Development and validation of a computational model for androgen receptor activity. Chem Res Toxicol. 2016;30(4):946-964. doi: 10.1021/
- Chemicals with activity characterized in in vivo androgen test methods: Hershberger, male pubertal, or other protocol (Excel file)
- Chemicals with activity characterized in in vivo androgen test methods: Hershberger, male pubertal, or other protocol (Tab-delimited text file)
Published as Table 3 in:
Browne P, et al. Development of a curated Hershberger database. Reproductive Toxicol. 2018;81:259-271. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2018.08.016
Please note: the lists above do not include chemicals included in Table 3 of Browne et al. but described as giving conflicting results in multiple in vivo assays.
Androgen Steroidogenesis
- Chemicals characterized in the H295R steroidogenesis assay with respect to their ability to alter androgen synthesis (Excel file)
- Chemicals characterized in the H295R steroidogenesis assay with respect to their ability to alter androgen synthesis (Tab-delimited text file)
Published as Table 2 in:
Pinto CL, et al. Identification of candidate reference chemicals for in vitro steroidogenesis assays. Toxicology In Vitro 2018;47:103-119. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2017.11.003
Estrogen Receptor Agonist and Antagonist Chemicals
- In vitro estrogen receptor agonist reference chemicals (Excel file) (R)
- In vitro estrogen receptor agonist reference chemicals (Tab-delimited text file) (R)
- In vivo estrogen receptor agonist reference chemicals from guideline-like uterotrophic studies (Excel file) (R)
- In vivo estrogen receptor agonist reference chemicals from guideline-like uterotrophic studies (Tab-delimited text file) (R)
Published as Tables 2 and 3 in:
Browne P, et al. Screening chemicals for estrogen receptor bioactivity using a computational model. Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Jul 21;49(14):8804-8814. doi: 10.1021/
- In vitro estrogen receptor agonist and antagonist reference chemicals (Excel file)
- In vitro estrogen receptor agonist and antagonist reference chemicals (Tab-delimited text file)
Published as Table 1 in:
OECD. Test no. 455: performance-based test guideline for stably transfected transactivation in vitro assays to detect estrogen receptor agonists and antagonists. In: OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals. Section 4. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2016. doi: 10.1787/
Curated Database of Rodent Uterotrophic Bioactivity
NICEATM compiled data from the peer-reviewed literature for in vivo uterotrophic assays that met six minimum criteria specified by accepted test guidelines. These data have potential utility for:
- Developing adverse outcome pathways or models of estrogenic activity.
- Prioritizing chemicals for further testing.
- Evaluating species-specific responses to chemicals.
NICEATM Guideline-like Uterotrophic Database
More information about the Uterotrophic Database
Estrogen Steroidogenesis
- Chemicals characterized in the H295R steroidogenesis assay with respect to their ability to alter estrogen synthesis (Excel file)
- Chemicals characterized in the H295R steroidogenesis assay with respect to their ability to alter estrogen synthesis (Tab-delimited text file)
Published as Table 3 in:
Pinto CL, et al. Identification of candidate reference chemicals for in vitro steroidogenesis assays. Toxicol In Vitro 2018;47:103-119. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2017.11.003
Thyroid Activity
- Chemicals characterized in thyroid activity assays (Excel file)
- Chemicals characterized in thyroid activity assays (Tab-delimited text file)
Published as supplemental data in:
Wegner S, et al. Identifying reference chemicals for thyroid bioactivity screening. Reproductive Toxicol 2016;65:402-413. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2016.08.016
Please note: only chemicals having a definitive classification of “active” or “inactive” are included.
EPA Chemical Lists
EPA IRIS Carcinogenicity Classifications
- EPA IRIS carcinogenicity classifications (Excel file; includes metadata describing fields)
- EPA IRIS carcinogenicity classifications (Tab-delimited text file)
This list contains chemicals classified for weight of evidence of carcinogenicity according to the EPA Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment (2005). Detailed information on these chemicals is available in the EPA IRIS database.
EPA Pesticide Active Ingredients
- EPA Pesticide Active Ingredients (Excel file; includes metadata describing fields)
- EPA Pesticide Active Ingredients (Tab-delimited text file)
This list contains chemicals identified as pesticide active ingredients, defined by EPA as the chemicals in a pesticide product that act to control the pests. This list was downloaded from the EPA Chemistry Dashboard on May 27, 2020.
EPA Pesticide Inert Ingredients, Food and Nonfood Use
- EPA Pesticide Inert Ingredients, Food and Nonfood Use (Excel file; includes metadata describing fields)
- EPA Pesticide Inert Ingredients, Food and Nonfood Use (Tab-delimited text file)
This list contains chemicals defined by EPA as pesticide inert ingredients, food and nonfood use. The chemicals on this list are inert ingredients used in pesticide products applied to food that have either tolerances or tolerance exemptions in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 40 CFR part 180, or where no residues are found in food. This list was downloaded from the EPA Chemistry Dashboard on May 27, 2020.
Eye Corrosion and Irritation
Recommended Substances for Optimization or Validation of In Vitro Ocular Toxicity Test Methods
- List of recommended reference substances (Excel file) (R)
- List of recommended reference substances (Tab-delimited text file) (R)
Published as Appendix H in:
Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM), NTP Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM). ICCVAM test method evaluation report: in vitro ocular toxicity test methods for identifying severe irritants and corrosives. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; 2006 Nov. NIH Publication No.: 07-4517.
More information about ICCVAM evaluations of in vitro ocular toxicity test methods
Skin Corrosion and Irritation
Recommended Chemicals for Validation of New In Vitro Skin Corrosivity Test Methods
- In Vitro Membrane Barrier Test Systems
- In Vitro Human Skin Model Systems
- In Vitro Transcutaneous Electrical Resistance Test
Published in:
Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM), NTP Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM). Recommended performance standards for in vitro test methods for skin corrosion. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; 2004 May. NIH Publication No.: 04-4510.
Skin Sensitization
Recommended Reference Substances for the Murine Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA)
- List of recommended reference substances (Excel file)
- List of recommended reference substances (Tab-delimited text file)
Published as Appendix F in:
Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM), NTP Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM). Recommended performance standards: murine local lymph node assay. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; 2010. NIH Publication No.: 09-7357.
Note: In guidance issued in February 2020, FDA stated that it no longer recommends that sponsors conduct the LLNA to assess the sensitization potential of topical drug products due to the limitations of the assay. As an alternative to accepted guinea pig tests, FDA will consider a battery of in silico, in chemico, and in vitro studies that have been shown to adequately predict human skin sensitization with an accuracy similar to existing in vivo methods.
NICEATM LLNA Database
Data from analyses of the LLNA conducted on behalf of ICCVAM by NICEATM are available to interested stakeholders as a reference for developing and evaluating alternative approaches to testing and assessment that replace, reduce, or refine the use of animals for identification of potential skin sensitizers.
Human Predictive Patch Test (HPPT) Database
Data were collected by NICEATM and the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) from 1555 publications for 2277 human predictive patch tests (HPPTs). Data from two types of HPPT were included: the human repeat insult patch test and the human maximization test.
Tox21 Chemicals
- Tox21 chemicals (Excel file; includes metadata describing fields)
- Tox21 chemicals (Tab-delimited text file)
This list includes the 9000+ chemicals tested in the Tox21 Program. Chemicals are from the EPA's invitrodb v3.2 (March 2020).