Skip to Main Navigation
Skip to Page Content
  • Skip to Atlas Navigation

    • Liver - Focus

    Image of basophilic focus in the liver from a male F344/N rat in a subchronic study
    Basophilic focus (arrows) in a male F344/N rat from a subchronic study.
    Figure 1 of 10
    Image of basophilic focus in the liver from a male F344/N rat in a subchronic study
    Basophilic focus in a male F344/N rat from a subchronic study (higher magnification of Figure 1).
    Figure 2 of 10
    Image of eosinophilic focus in the liver from a male B6C3F1 mouse in a chronic study
    Eosinophilic focus (arrows) in a male B6C3F1 mouse from a chronic study.
    Figure 3 of 10
    Image of eosinophilic focus in the liver from a male B6C3F1 mouse in a chronic study
    Eosinophilic focus in a male B6C3F1 mouse from a chronic study (higher magnification of Figure 3).
    Figure 4 of 10
    Image of clear cell focus in the liver from a female B6C3F1 mouse in a chronic study
    Clear cell focus in a female B6C3F1 mouse from a chronic study.
    Figure 5 of 10
    Image of clear cell focus in the liver from a female B6C3F1 mouse in a chronic study
    Clear cell focus in a female B6C3F1 mouse from a chronic study (higher magnification of Figure 5).
    Figure 6 of 10
    Image of mixed cell focus in the liver from a female Harlan Sprague-Dawley rat in a chronic study
    Mixed cell focus in a female Harlan Sprague-Dawley rat from a chronic study.
    Figure 7 of 10
    Image of mixed cell focus in the liver from a female Harlan Sprague-Dawley rat in a chronic study
    Mixed cell focus in a female Harlan Sprague-Dawley rat from a chronic study (higher magnification of Figure 7).
    Figure 8 of 10
    Image of mixed cell focus in the liver from a male B6C3F1 mouse in a chronic study
    Mixed cell focus in a male B6C3F1 mouse from a chronic study.
    Figure 9 of 10
    Image of mixed cell focus in the liver from a male B6C3F1 mouse in a chronic study
    Mixed cell focus in a male B6C3F1 mouse from a chronic study (higher magnification of Figure 9).
    Figure 10 of 10
    next arrow
    View all images

    comment:

    Foci of cellular alteration, diagnosed simply as “foci” in NTP studies, can occur spontaneously in rats and mice but may also be induced by treatment. They range from less than a lobule to several lobules in size. Foci are presumptive preneoplastic lesions that can vary from barely perceptible to cytomorphologically and tinctorially discrete lesions. Foci typically blend imperceptibly with, and do not compress, surrounding hepatic parenchyma, though minimal compression may occur. Foci are relatively common in chronic studies but uncommon in 90-day studies. They are subclassified based on hematoxylin and eosin tinctorial properties and cytoplasmic features.

    Basophilic foci predominantly stain with hematoxylin ( Figure 1image opens in a pop-up window , arrows; Figure 2image opens in a pop-up window ). A tigroid variant has been identified in rats but is considered a subclassification of basophilic focus. Eosinophilic foci typically stain more eosinophilic than surrounding hepatocytes and often consist of hepatocytes that are larger than the adjacent normal parenchyma ( Figure 3image opens in a pop-up window , arrows; Figure 4image opens in a pop-up window ). Clear cell foci have empty spaces in hepatocyte cytoplasm surrounding centrally localized nuclei. The clear spaces represent glycogen dissolved out during fixation and processing. Clear cell foci are readily identified because they stand out against surrounding parenchyma that has a more uniformly eosinophilic cytoplasm ( Figure 5image opens in a pop-up window and Figure 6image opens in a pop-up window ). Some texts discuss vacuolated cell foci, but these are now diagnosed as focal fatty change and are not considered foci. Mixed cell focus is diagnosed when there is no single predominant phenotype. Figure 7image opens in a pop-up window and Figure 8image opens in a pop-up window represent a mixed cell focus composed of clear cells, vacuolated cells, and amphophilic cells with no single cell type constituting more than 80% of the focus cells. Figure 9image opens in a pop-up window and Figure 10image opens in a pop-up window present a mixed focus composed of an outer rim of basophilic cells surrounding an inner core of clear cells, each comprising an equal proportion of the cell types present.

    recommendation:

    Because foci are presumptive preneoplastic lesions, they should be diagnosed whenever present. The current NTP recommendation is to document all foci and to classify these into subtypes (basophilic, eosinophilic, clear cell, or mixed). A severity grade is not required for foci unless the pathologist feels it is necessary to highlight differences among the study groups.

    related links:

    Liver, Hepatocyte - Glycogen Accumulation and Depletion

    references:

    Eustis SL, Boorman GA, Harada T, Popp JA. 1990. Liver. In: Pathology of the Fischer Rat (Boorman GA, Eustis SL, Elwell MR, Montgomery CA, MacKenzie WF, eds). Academic Press, San Diego, 71-94.
    Abstract: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog/9002563

    Harada T, Enomoto A, Boorman GA, Maronpot RR. 1999. Liver and gallbladder. In: Pathology of the Mouse: Reference and Atlas (Maronpot RR, Boorman GA, Gaul BW, eds). Cache River Press, Vienna, IL, 119-183.
    Abstract: http://www.cacheriverpress.com/books/pathmouse.htm

    Harada T, Maronpot RR, Enomoto A, Tamano S, Ward JM. 1996. Changes in the liver and gallbladder. In: Pathobiology of the Aging Mouse (Mohr U, Dungworth DL, Capen CC, Carlton WW, Sundberg JP, Ward JM, eds). ILSI Press, Washington, DC, 2:207-241.
    Abstract: http://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/008994685

    Harada T, Maronpot RR, Morris RW, Stitzel KA, Boorman GA. 1989. Morphological and stereological characterization of hepatic foci of cellular alteration in control Fischer 344 rats. Toxicol Pathol 17:579-593.
    Abstract: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2483465

    Maronpot RR, Harada T, Murthy ASK, Boorman GA. 1989. Documenting foci of hepatocellular alteration in two-year carcinogenicity studies: Current practices of the National Toxicology Program. Toxicol Pathol 17:675-684.
    Abstract: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2697942

    National Toxicology Program. 2011. NTP TOX-82. 3-Month Toxicity Studies of Estragole (CAS No. 140-67-0) Administered by Gavage to F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice. NTP, Research Triangle Park, NC.
    Full Text: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/htdocs/ST_rpts/tox082.pdf

    National Toxicology Program. 2011. NTP TR-563. Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Pulegone (CAS No. 89-82-7) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Gavage Studies). NTP, Research Triangle Park, NC.
    Full Text: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/htdocs/LT_rpts/TR563.pdf

    Thoolen B, Maronpot RR, Harada T, Nyska A, Rousseaux C, Nolte T, Malarkey D, Kaufmann W, Kutter K, Deschl U, Nakae D, Gregson R, Winlove M, Brix A, Singl B, Belpoggi F, Ward JM. 2010. Hepatobiliary lesion nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for lesions in rats and mice (INHAND). Toxicol Pathol 38:5S-81S.
    Full Text: http://tpx.sagepub.com/content/38/7_suppl/5S.full

    Back to top

    Web page last updated on: November 04, 2016